Papers |
||
| Kogan, M., & Wagers, M. (submitted). Decomposing subject retrieval: Diverging interference profiles for agreement and thematic dependencies in English. | ||
| Cartner, M.*, Kogan, M.*, Webster, N.*, Wagers, M., & Sichel, I. (2026). Subject islands do not reduce to construction-specific discourse function. Cognition, 271, 106467. | ||
Kogan, M. (2023). Maintaining Syntactic Positions and Thematic Roles in Memory [Master's Thesis]. University of California, Santa Cruz. |
||
Presentations |
||
Syntactic Representations and Interference in Memory |
||
Syntactic positional similarity modulates interference for thematic and agreement dependencies. |
||
Sources of distortion and confusion in distributed representations of morphosyntactic structure. | ||
Modeling interference with distributed representations of lexical, morphological, and positional information. |
||
Probing facilitatory and inhibitory interference with English ditransitives. |
||
Investigating syntactic gating during subject retrieval with English ditransitives. |
||
Maintaining syntactic positions and thematic roles in memory: Evidence from ditransitive alternations in English. |
||
The Role of Specifiers in a Content-Addressable Retrieval Mechanism. |
||
Experimental Syntax of (Subject) Islands |
||
Subject islands are not caused by information structure clashes: cross-constructional evidence. |
||
Information structure alone cannot account for subject islandhood: an experimental study. |
||
“I am a rock, I am an island”: Subject islands are not reducible to discourse function |
||
Subject islands are not caused by information structure clashes: evidence from Topicalization. |
||
Deploying Animacy in Parsing and Comprehension |
||
Canonical Argument Alignment Modulates Gap, but not RP, Acceptability in English. |
||
The Subject-Object Asymmetry in Embedded Questions: Evidence from the Maze. |
||
”It’s alive!”: Animacy-based structural expectations rapidly update with context. |
||